Assessing the Effectiveness of Research Organizations

Author:

Altschuld James W.1,Zheng Henry Y.1

Affiliation:

1. Ohio State University

Abstract

Assessing the effectiveness of research organizations in education (as well as those in the social sciences) is hampered by the lack of measurable goals and identifiable outcome criteria. In this review, key issues in evaluating effectiveness are identified and insights on the application of major assessment approaches are provided. Most research organizations in education tend to have ambiguous goals and incomplete technologies or strategies for achieving them. The goal-attainment approach with its emphasis on efficiency and output measures tells only a limited story of effectiveness. The stakeholder approach, emphasizing social references and extrinsic measures, is more relevant, for it indicates the extent to which stakeholders'needs are satisfied. The systems approach is useful in sensitizing evaluators to the importance of internal processes in improving organizational effectiveness. The competing values framework is an attempt to integrate major assessment paradigms. It shows that value trade-offs are inherent in the selection of evaluation approaches. Understanding an organization's focus, structure, and outcome will facilitate the ultimate choice of effectiveness criteria and evaluation strategies.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Social Sciences,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Versão Reduzida da Escala de Avaliação do Desempenho Grupal (EADG - II);Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación – e Avaliação Psicológica;2022-07

2. Consideration of Knowledge and Technology Transfer Characteristics for Research Evaluation;Incentives and Performance;2014-10-17

3. Evaluating Organizational Performance;American Journal of Evaluation;2013-04-18

4. Training evaluation in Italian corporate universities: a stakeholder-based analysis;International Journal of Training and Development;2010-11-21

5. Validating an evaluation checklist using a mixed method design;Evaluation and Program Planning;2010-08

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3