Abstract
Theory and research have not kept pace with the growing interest in evaluating quality of mental health care, resulting in the use of unvalidated quality indicators. A framework for validating quality indicators is offered by which quality is viewed as the relationship between service structures, processes, and outcomes. Adoption of this framework will facilitate the measurement of quality using valid indicators and should be useful to agencies in their continuous quality improvement efforts. Valid information about the quality of mental health care services will help purchasers and consumers make more informed health care decisions.
Subject
General Social Sciences,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Reference71 articles.
1. Continuous Improvement as an Ideal in Health Care
2. Scientific standards of psychological practice: Issues and recommendations;Beutler, L.E.,1995
3. Advances in program theory;Bickman, L.,1990
Cited by
44 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献