Affiliation:
1. Empire State College, State University of New York
2. University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey
Abstract
The 75-year history of marginality theory is reviewed and evaluated, leading to the recommendation that the use of the marginality idea be discarded by social scientists because it lacks construct validity. A review of the literature reveals that, at present, the concept of marginality is employed in five different social science lines of investigation. These models are examined fromthe perspective of their contribution to the validity of the construct and are found wanting. Marginality is shown to be a concept that did not fulfill its promise of explaining the effects on people of immigration, culture clash, and other transitional situations, such as status, role, or class changes. Evidence is presented that marginality is unscientifically founded and has been applied so indiscriminately as to be useless in the social sciences.
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Anthropology,Cultural Studies,Social Psychology
Reference54 articles.
1. Social support and acculturative stress in the multicultural workplace
2. Bamber, J. H. (1973). Adolescent marginality—A further study. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 88, 3-21.
3. Marginality, Stress and Ethnic Identification in an Acculturated Aboriginal Community
4. Braithwaite, L. (1960). Pluralism. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 83, 816-836.
5. Browne, P. J. & Cotton, C. C. (1975). Marginality, a force for the OD practitioner. Training and Development Journal, 29, 14-18.
Cited by
30 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献