Imagining Life Beyond a Crisis: A Four Quadrant Model to Conceptualize Possible Futures

Author:

Power Séamus A1ORCID,Schaeffer Merlin1,Heisig Jan P23,Udsen Rebecca1,Ordóñez-Bueso Liisalotte1,Morton Thomas1

Affiliation:

1. University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

2. WZB Berlin Social Science Center, Berlin, Germany

3. Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany

Abstract

In this article we report evidence from a series of semi-structured interviews with a broad sample of people living in Denmark ( n = 21), about their perspectives on the future during the first months of the global Covid-19 pandemic. The thematic and discursive analyses, based on an abductive ontology, illustrate imaginings of the future along two vectors: individual to collective and descriptive to moral. On a descriptive and individual level, people imagined getting through the pandemic on a myopic day-by-day basis; on a descriptive and collective level, people imagined changes to work and socializing. Their future was bound and curtailed by their immediate present. On a moral and individual level, respondents were less detailed in their reports, but some vowed to change their behaviors. On a moral and collective level, respondents reported what the world should be like and discussed changes to environmental behaviors such as traveling, commuting, and work. The model suggests the domain of individual moral imaginings is the most difficult domain for people to imagine beyond the practicalities of their everyday lives. The implications of this model for comprehending imaginations of the future are discussed.

Funder

University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Social Science

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Anthropology,Cultural Studies,Social Psychology

Reference33 articles.

1. Collective Futures: How Projections About the Future of Society Are Related to Actions and Attitudes Supporting Social Change

2. Cultural Beliefs About Societal Change

3. Using thematic analysis in psychology

4. Imagining Collective Futures

5. Gillespie A., Glaveanu V, de Saint-Laurent C. (in press). Pragmatism and methodology: doing research that matters with mixed methods. Cambridge University Press.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3