Assuring the Probability of Failure on Demand of a Safety Instrumented System without Full Proof Testing

Author:

Rielly John1

Affiliation:

1. Sellafield Ltd., Cumbria, UK

Abstract

The Sellafield site, formerly known as Windscale and Calder Works, is a large nuclear plant sited in West Cumbria, in the North West of England. The Sellafield site is probably the most complex nuclear facility in the world, with safety systems to match. Many of the safety systems have been ‘back-fitted’ onto decades-old plant as safety cases have been modernised; however, due to the original design, many of these systems cannot be fully end-to-end proof tested. It is for this reason, Sellafield Ltd has developed their own risk-based process of how to assure the probability of failure on demand of a safety system when one or more of the components of the system cannot (throughout this paper where it is stated that the proof test ‘cannot be carried out’ it means it is undesirable for safety, practicality or business reasons) be fully or actively tested. Sellafield Ltd are leading the way in the proof testing of legacy plant throughout the nuclear and chemical industries in the United Kingdom; these arrangements, as described below, are considered (by Sellafield Ltd) as best practices for assuring the probability of failure on demand of Safety Instrumented System in legacy plants.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Applied Mathematics,Control and Optimization,Instrumentation

Reference5 articles.

1. CRR 428/2002. Principles for proof testing of safety instrumented systems in the chemical industry. Billingham: ABB Ltd for the Health and Safety Executive (HSE), p.17, part 4.2.1(a).

2. CRR 428/2002. Principles for proof testing of safety instrumented systems in the chemical industry. Billingham: ABB Ltd for the Health and Safety Executive (HSE), p.5, part 4.1.1(a).

3. CRR 428/2002. Principles for proof testing of safety instrumented systems in the chemical industry. Billingham: ABB Ltd for the Health and Safety Executive (HSE), p.5, part 4.1.1(b).

4. Dearden HT. Functional Safety in Practice. Llandudno: Time Domain Solutions Ltd., pp.144–158.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3