Reducing the Number of Rabbits in Eye and Skin Irritancy Tests

Author:

Dalbey W.1,Rodriguez S.1,Wilkins K.1,Cope C.1

Affiliation:

1. Environmental and Health Sciences Laboratory Mobil Oil Corporation P.O. Box 1029 Princeton, NJ 08543

Abstract

Reduction in the number of rabbits used for acute testing of irritation in the eye and skin is a worthwhile goal, and some recent publications have supported such reduction from six to three animals. In anticipation of making such reductions in our laboratory, data from 185 eye and 179 skin irritation tests performed in-house were evaluated within the framework of several schemes of classification. Mean scores for irritation in all possible two, three, four, and five-rabbit subsets were compared to scores with all six rabbits. Parameters included mean weighted Draize scores (eye) and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) primary irritation index (skin). Classification of irritants is often based on scales with two or more categories of relative severity (e.g., nonirritating, mild, moderate, severe). Therefore, irritation scores of each subset were grouped into two, three, four, or five categories of irritation. Overall agreement of rankings for the subsets was closer to rankings with six rabbits when fewer categories were used with greater numbers of animals in the subset. Mean agreement across all categories was >90% with three rabbits and four categories for both eye and skin irritation. However, agreement within a given category across subsets was best with nonirritants and least among irritants; eye irritants with mean weighted Draize scores of 16–35 had only ∼76% agreement with 3 rabbits/subset. Comparisons were also made between subsets of three rabbits and the original six rabbits using both the European Community (EC) system of mean values for eye irritation and the OSHA system based on the number of individuals with “positive” scores. Agreement was better with the EC system. To maintain accuracy within the framework of American guidelines, our laboratory will continue to use six rabbits for regulatory studies. Other investigators should carefully evaluate the effect on accuracy of results before reducing the numbers of animals used per acute study.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Toxicology

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3