Affiliation:
1. Department of English, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX, USA
Abstract
This article analyzes the speeches of two U.S. politicians—President Donald Trump and President Joe Biden—to present how they make their arguments about climate change using various frames. While frames are rhetorical acts, they are also a form of persuasion. In particular, the author demonstrates how Trump foregrounded negative frames with fear-inducing elements. He presented job losses and economic harm as consequences of joining the Paris Climate Accord, putting him on the defensive. In contrast, Biden utilized positive frames to strengthen his arguments and aligned more closely with the environmental justice framework. Inspired by the rhetoric of the framing strategies employed by these two speakers, the study suggests that technical communicators should focus on using language that constructs new frames to enhance the success of their argumentations.
Reference38 articles.
1. American Presidency Project. (2020, September 14). Remarks by Vice President Joe Biden in Wilmington, Delaware on climate change (2022, November 12). https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/node/345118
2. Climate Change Research Across Disciplines: The Value and Uses of Multidisciplinary Research Reviews for Technical Communication
3. Exploring the Environmental Justice Implications of Hurricane Harvey Flooding in Greater Houston, Texas
4. Cohen B. (2020, November 7). Young voters, motivated by climate change and environmental justice, helped propel Biden’s campaign (2022, December 12). Inside Climate News. https://insideclimatenews.org/news/07112020/young-voters-climate-change-environmental-justice-joe-biden/