The Emergence and Loss of the English Minor Complementizers till and until

Author:

Castro-Chao Noelia1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain

Abstract

This article examines the development of the subordinators till and until as minor complementizers in the Late Middle English and Early Modern English periods. An analysis of data obtained from a number of sources shows that till/ until underwent a process of secondary grammaticalization, emerging as complementizers introducing clauses governed by the desiderative predicate long. The findings further suggest that the use of till/ until-clauses with long was the result of a process of lexical diffusion from the semantically related pattern think ( it) long till/until-clause (in the sense of ‘to seem or appear long, to be wearisome (to a person) (until something happens)’). In Late Modern English, till/until-clauses following long were lost and replaced by competing patterns with to-infinitives and for. . .to-infinitives, the latter emerging at the time as a new complement type. The article discusses the motivations and broader implications of the obsolescence of till/until-complements, which failed to spread to other members of the class of verbs of “desire,” such as desire, thirst, or yearn, and thus remained at the margins of the English system of complementation.

Funder

European Regional Development Fund

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación

Consellería de Cultura, Educación e Ordenación Universitaria, Xunta de Galicia

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics

Reference56 articles.

1. CLMET3.0 = De Smet Hendrik, Diller Hans-Jürgen, Tyrkkö Jukka. 2013. The Corpus of Late Modern English Texts. Version 3.0. Leuven: K.U. Leuven.

2. COHA = Davies Mark. 2010. The Corpus of Historical American English. https://www.english-corpora.org/coha/ (30 March, 2022).

3. EEBO BYU = Davies Mark. 2017. Early English Books Online Corpus. https://www.english-corpora.org/eebo/ (5 April, 2022).

4. EEBOCorp 1.0 = Petré Peter. 2013. Early English Books Online Corpus 1.0. https://lirias.kuleuven.be/handle/123456789/416330 (5 February, 2021).

5. PPCME2 = Kroch Anthony, Taylor Ann, Santorini Beatrice. 2000- The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English, 2nd edn., release 4. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania, Department of Linguistics. https://www.ling.upenn.edu/hist-corpora/PPCME2-RELEASE-4/index.html (5 February, 2021).

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3