Accent Bias and Perceptions of Professional Competence in England

Author:

Levon Erez1ORCID,Sharma Devyani2ORCID,Watt Dominic J. L.3ORCID,Cardoso Amanda4ORCID,Ye Yang5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

2. Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

3. University of York, York, UK

4. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

5. University of Greenwich, London, UK

Abstract

Unequal outcomes in professional hiring for individuals from less privileged backgrounds have been widely reported in England. Although accent is one of the most salient signals of such a background, its role in unequal professional outcomes remains underexamined. This paper reports on a large-scale study of contemporary attitudes to accents in England. A large representative sample ( N = 848) of the population in England judged the interview performance and perceived hirability of “candidates” for a trainee solicitor position at a corporate law firm. Candidates were native speakers of one of five English accents stratified by region, ethnicity, and class. The results suggest persistent patterns of bias against certain accents in England, particularly Southern working-class varieties, though moderated by factors such as listener age, content of speech, and listeners’ psychological predispositions. We discuss the role that the observed bias may play in perpetuating social inequality in England and encourage further research on the relationship between accent and social mobility.

Funder

Economic and Social Research Council

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics

Reference117 articles.

1. Lenth Russell. 2020. Emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means (version R package version 1.4.5). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans

2. Comprehension of familiar and unfamiliar native accents under adverse listening conditions.

3. The theory of planned behavior

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3