Affiliation:
1. Department of Sociology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
Abstract
With nonstandard work on the rise, workers are increasingly forced into bad jobs—jobs that are low-paying, part-time, short-term, and dead-end. But some people, especially in cultural industries, embrace this kind of work. To understand why some might choose bad jobs when better options are available, this paper examines the job preferences of aspiring artists, who often rely on bad day jobs as they attempt to achieve economic success in the arts. Using interviews with 68 college-educated artists, I find that their preferences are informed not only by utility and identity considerations—two factors established in the literature—but also by the value of bad jobs as commitment devices, which reinforce dedication to career aspirations. The case offers new insights into the connection between jobs and careers and enriches the concept of the commitment device with a sociological perspective, showing that these devices are not one-time contracts but ongoing practices.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Sociology and Political Science
Reference74 articles.
1. Abbing, H. (2008). Why Are Artists Poor? The Exceptional Economy of the Arts. Amsterdam University Press.
2. Alper N. O., Wassall G. H. (2000). More than once in a blue moon: Multiple jobholdings by American artists (National Endowment for the Arts). Seven Locks Press.
3. The Politics of Cultural Work
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献