Comparison of outcomes of different osteotomy sites for hallux valgus: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Fukushi Jun-ichi12ORCID,Tanaka Hirofumi13,Nishiyama Takayuki14,Hirao Makoto15,Kubota Makoto16ORCID,Kakihana Masataka17ORCID,Nozawa Daisuke18,Watanabe Kota19,Okuda Ryuzo110

Affiliation:

1. Guideline Committee of Hallux Valgus, Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot, Tokyo, Japan

2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Clinical Research Center, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan

3. Hyakutake Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Clinic, Saga, Japan

4. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kakogawa Central City Hospital, Kakogawa, Japan

5. Department of Orthopaedics, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan

6. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Katsushika Medical Center, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

7. First Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Saitama Medical Center, Koshigaya, Japan

8. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan

9. Second Division of Physical Therapy, School of Health Sciences, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan

10. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rakusai-Shimizu Hospital, Kyoto, Japan

Abstract

Background Hallux valgus (HV) is a common foot deformity for which several corrective surgical procedures, with different osteotomy sites, have been reported. The purpose of the present study was to systematically review randomized (RCTs) or controlled (CCTs) clinical trials and perform meta-analysis on outcomes of different osteotomy sites of the first metatarsal. Methods An extensive literature search was conducted in PubMed and the Cochrane Library from January 1983 to July 2020. Studies were identified using the terms “hallux valgus” and “osteotomy”. We included RCTs or CCTs comparing different locations of osteotomy for the first metatarsal bone (distal vs. mid-shaft, distal vs. proximal, and mid-shaft vs. proximal). The surgical outcomes included postoperative hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, pain visual analog scale (VAS) score, perioperative complications and recurrence of deformity. We enrolled 10 studies with a total of 793 feet in the qualitative synthesis following full-text screening. Results A majority of patients included in the enrolled trials showed mild to moderate deformity, with mean HVA <40°. Out of the 10 enrolled studies; six compared distal osteotomies with mid-shaft osteotomies and showed no significant differences in the surgical outcomes between the scarf and chevron groups; three RCTs compared distal osteotomies with proximal osteotomies with conflicting results, one RCT showed the superiority of proximal osteotomy while the other two RCTs showed equivalent outcomes; one study that compared between mid-shaft and proximal osteotomies showed equivalent outcomes between the groups. Conclusion For the management of mild to moderate HV deformity, we found no significant clinical and radiological differences between patients treated with scarf and chevron osteotomies. Further controlled trials comparing different sites of osteotomies for moderate to severe HV deformity are needed.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3