Participants’ Perspectives of Their Involvement in Medical Device Trials: A Focus Groups Study

Author:

Kitchen William R.1ORCID,Downey Candice L.2,Brown Julia M.3,Jayne David G.2,Randell Rebecca4

Affiliation:

1. Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James’s University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK

2. Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James’s, University of Leeds, St James’s University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK

3. Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, Worsley Building, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK

4. Faculty of Health Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, BD7 1DP, UK

Abstract

Background Medical technologies have the potential to improve quality and efficiency of healthcare. The design of clinical trials should consider participants’ perspectives to optimise enrolment, engagement and satisfaction. This study aims to assess patients’ perceptions of their involvement in medical device trials, to inform the designs of future medical technology implementation and evaluation. Methods Four focus groups were undertaken with a total of 16 participants who had participated in a study testing hospital inpatient remote monitoring devices. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and underwent thematic analysis. Results Four main themes emerged: patients’ motivations for participating in medical device research; patients’ perceptions of technology in medicine; patients’ understanding of trial methodology; and patients’ perceptions of the benefits of involvement in medical device trials. The appeal of new technology is a contributing factor to the decision to consent, although concerns remain regarding risks associated with technology in healthcare settings. Perceived benefits of participating in device trials include extra care, social benefits and comradery with other participants seen using the devices, although there is a perceived lack of confidence in using technology amongst older patients. Conclusion Future device trials should prioritise information sharing with participants both before and after the trial. Verbal and written information alongside practical demonstrations can help to combat a lack of confidence with technology. Randomised trials and those with placebo- or sham-controlled arms should not be considered as barriers to participation. Study results should be disseminated to participants in lay format as soon as possible, subject to participant permission.

Funder

Health Foundation

National Institute for Health Research

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3