Abstract
This article examines the ways in which issues of `secularism' are politicized within the nation state, particularly the ways in which women's rights become critical sites of conflict surrounding political hegemony and minority rights. Focusing on judgments related to Muslim women in post-Independence India, it argues that legal solutions have the potential to be powerful instruments for achieving greater gender equity as well as insidious sites for recuperation of gender, class, and religious hegemonies in the guise of protection and liberation. The slippage between the stated intent, subtext, and effects of both `progressive' and `reactionary' legislation indicates that feminist theorists should engage with issues of personal law strategically while seeking alternate meanings of community and identity.
Subject
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Anthropology,Cultural Studies
Reference27 articles.
1. Agnes, Flavia (1994) `Triple Talaq Judgment: Do Women Really Benefit?' , Economic and Political Weekly 29: 1169-1170 .
2. Deconstruction and Law's Other: Towards a Feminist Theory of Embodied Legal Rights
3. Begam, Sherafennisa (1989) `Maintenance and Muslim Women: Religious Orthodoxy v. Judicial Activism' , Cochin University Law Review 13: 279-308 .
4. What Is a Muslim? Fundamental Commitment and Cultural Identity
5. Religious Minorities and the Secular State: Reflections on an Indian Impasse
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献