Collaboration Consequences: New Public Management and Police-Academic Partnerships

Author:

Sanders Carrie B.1,Langan Debra1

Affiliation:

1. Wilfrid Laurier University Brantford Campus, Ontario, Canada

Abstract

With increasing pressure on public organizations to demonstrate accountability, police services and public universities are being tasked with demonstrating how their institutional strategies are effective and economically efficient. In this paper, we draw on our own research collaborations with two different Canadian police services (Bluewater and Greenfield) on a similar community crime prevention strategy, Situation Tables. We illustrate how new public management practices are embedded in the political, economic, and organizational contexts that have inspired police-academic partnerships and invigorated the evidence-based policing movement in Canada. Our analysis illustrates how our partnerships were influenced by the performance strand of new public management that prioritizes the quantification of measures of outputs over qualitative evaluations of impact. We argue that these practices, if not interrogated, can jeopardize the integrity of evidence-based practice and policy development. Academic freedom must be retained when partnering with the police to ensure an examination of the implications of police practices.

Funder

Social Science and Humanities Research Councils of Canada

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Social Sciences

Reference61 articles.

1. Babayan Alexey, Landry-Thompson Tamara, Stevens Adam. 2015. “Evaluations of the Brant Community Response Team Initiative: Six-month Report.” Brantford, ON, Canada: Brant Country Health Unit.

2. Metric Power

3. Ending the ‘dialogue of the deaf’: evidence and policing policies and practices. An Australian case study

4. Brown Jaime, Newberry Jason. 2015. “An Evaluation of the Connectivity Situation Tables in Waterloo Region.” Evaluation Report Submitted to Waterloo Region Connectivity Partnership. Guelph, ON, Canada: Taylor Newberry Consulting.

5. Policing and research: two cultures separated by an almost‐common language

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3