Affiliation:
1. Marketing, Operations and Digital Business, MMU Business School, London, UK
Abstract
The assumption that capitalist globalization has been a period of overall stagnation is the dominant consensus opinion within Marxist political economy. This paper criticizes this opinion and shows that it rests on a mis-measure of the transition of the centrally planned economics of the ex-USSR, Central and Eastern Europe (CEE), and China developed by the official statistical agencies during the Cold War. This mis-measure has the effect of underestimating both the collapse of physical output in the ex-USSR and CEE during the transition and underestimating the growth of genuine national income after the creation of market economies where previously there had been none. This paper develops some alternative, much higher, estimates of the real growth of national income during the transition period.
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Philosophy
Reference92 articles.
1. ACAS. 2008. Conflict at work: The pattern of disputes in Britain since 1980. Ref: 03/08. London.
2. Alton T. 1991. Occasional Papers Nos. 115-119 of the Research Project on National Income in East Central Europe. New York.
3. Soviet National Income, 1958–1964
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献