Guidelines for the Design and Conduct of Clinical Studies in Knee Articular Cartilage Repair

Author:

Mithoefer Kai1,Saris Daniel B.F.2,Farr Jack3,Kon Elizaveta4,Zaslav Kenneth5,Cole Brian J.6,Ranstam Jonas7,Yao Jian8,Shive Matthew9,Levine David10,Dalemans Wilfried11,Brittberg Mats12

Affiliation:

1. Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

2. University Medical Centre, Utrecht, the Netherlands

3. OrthoIndy Knee Care Institute, Indianapolis, IN, USA

4. Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute, Bologna, Italy

5. Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA

6. Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA

7. Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden

8. Zimmer Orthobiologics, Austin, TX, USA

9. Biosyntech, Laval, QC, Canada

10. Genzyme Biosurgery, Cambridge, MA, USA

11. Tigenix, Leuven, Belgium

12. University of Gothenburg, Kungsbacka, Sweden

Abstract

Objective: To summarize current clinical research practice and develop methodological standards for objective scientific evaluation of knee cartilage repair procedures and products. Design: A comprehensive literature review was performed of high-level original studies providing information relevant for the design of clinical studies on articular cartilage repair in the knee. Analysis of cartilage repair publications and synopses of ongoing trials were used to identify important criteria for the design, reporting, and interpretation of studies in this field. Results: Current literature reflects the methodological limitations of the scientific evidence available for articular cartilage repair. However, clinical trial databases of ongoing trials document a trend suggesting improved study designs and clinical evaluation methodology. Based on the current scientific information and standards of clinical care, detailed methodological recommendations were developed for the statistical study design, patient recruitment, control group considerations, study endpoint definition, documentation of results, use of validated patient-reported outcome instruments, and inclusion and exclusion criteria for the design and conduct of scientifically sound cartilage repair study protocols. A consensus statement among the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) and contributing authors experienced in clinical trial design and implementation was achieved. Conclusions: High-quality clinical research methodology is critical for the optimal evaluation of current and new cartilage repair technologies. In addition to generally applicable principles for orthopedic study design, specific criteria and considerations apply to cartilage repair studies. Systematic application of these criteria and considerations can facilitate study designs that are scientifically rigorous, ethical, practical, and appropriate for the question(s) being addressed in any given cartilage repair research project.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Biomedical Engineering,Immunology and Allergy

Cited by 49 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3