Patient Evaluation of Outpatient Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Service following Lower Limb Injuries Using a Developed Validated Questionnaire

Author:

Menakaya Cu1,Khan As2,Nunn T3,Pennington N3,Ward M4,Malhotra R2,Muthukumar N5,Mohsen A5

Affiliation:

1. Trauma and Orthopaedic Clinical Research Fellow, Department of Orthopaedics, Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull Royal Infirmary

2. Core Specialty Trainee, Department of Orthopaedics, Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull Royal Infirmary and Yorkshire and the Humber Postgraduate Deanery, University of Leeds

3. Trauma and Orthopaedics Specialist Registrar, Department of Orthopaedics, Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull Royal Infirmary and Yorkshire and the Humber Postgraduate Deanery, University of Leeds

4. Senior Nurse and VTE Nurse Specialist, Hull Royal Infirmary Fracture Clinic

5. Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon, Department of Orthopaedics, Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust

Abstract

This paper explores patients' perceptions of a new service and protocol for managing outpatient venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis, using either subcutaneous Dalteparin or oral off-license Dabigatran in patients with lower limb injury requiring immobilisation. Establishing a patient's perspective is part of good practice as, when this is positive, it aids patient compliance and protocol dissemination. A questionnaire consisting of fifty questions was given at random to one hundred patients over a six month period when they attended the trauma clinic. Each question was scored on a five point Likert scale (1=poor, 5=excellent) by the patient. The internal consistency of the questionnaire (Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient) was more than 0.9 in all domains. Qualitative analysis was done for open-ended questions. One hundred respondents completed the questionnaire, two were void due to significant amounts of incomplete data. The gender split was 54 females, 43 males, and one did not answer the question. The average age was 43 (range 18–72). Sixty seven respondents were first-time attenders, 22 were follow-up patients and nine did not complete this section. The overall average score was 4.26 (range 1–5), with 90% of the patients recommending the service. The overall patient satisfaction for a VTE prophylaxis service is high although there is room for improvement as demonstrated by the range of the scores.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3