Positive end-expiratory pressure and the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing general anaesthesia

Author:

Lilaj Krenar1,Shpata Vjollca2ORCID,Bollano Enton1,Kuçi Saimir1

Affiliation:

1. General Surgery Department, University Hospital Center ‘Mother Teresa’, Tirana, Albania

2. Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Sports of Tirana, Albania

Abstract

General anaesthesia causes atelectasis, which can lead to impaired respiratory function. Positive end-expiratory pressure is a mechanical manoeuvre that increases functional residual capacity and prevents the collapse of the airways, thereby reducing atelectasis. Aim of the study: To evaluate the effect of intraoperative positive end-expiratory pressure and driving pressure on the development of postoperative pulmonary complications. Method: The prospective study included 83 patients undergoing abdominal surgery and receiving general anaesthesia. Patients were divided into two groups: with low intraoperative positive end-expiratory pressure (0–2cm H2O) and with high intraoperative positive end-expiratory pressure (8–10cm H2O). The primary endpoint is the development of postoperative pulmonary complications during follow-up. Results: The incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications in the group of low intraoperative positive end-expiratory pressure was 9.8%, while in the group of high positive end-expiratory pressure was 7.1% (p = 0.6), demonstrating that high positive end-expiratory pressure used during general anaesthesia does not affect the frequency of complications (odds ratio = 0.71, p = 0.6). In the multivariate analysis that controls for all confounders, driving pressure resulted in a significant and independent risk factor for complications. Conclusion: High intraoperative positive end-expiratory pressure does not affect the frequency of postoperative pulmonary complications. The increase in driving pressure is a risk factor for complications. Positive end-expiratory pressure is easily implemented, and its use does not result in significant economic costs.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3