Optimisation of perioperative investigations among elective orthopaedic patients in a Dublin-based teaching hospital

Author:

O’Sullivan Jane12ORCID,Collins Jack12,Cooper David3,Magdalina Ana4,Meehan Frances5,Kumar Lachmann6,Quinlan John7,O’Connor Donal3,Fitzpatrick Gerry5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anaesthetics, Letterkenny University Hospital, Letterkenny, Ireland

2. Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

3. Department of Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

4. Department of Statistics, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland

5. Department of Anaesthetics, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

6. Department of Medicine, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

7. Department of Orthopaedics, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

Abstract

Background The current National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines, in accordance with the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland guidelines, recommend the following haematological investigations for all patients undergoing major elective surgery: full blood count, renal profile and coagulation screen if clinically indicated. However, the guidelines fail to specify a time-interval for which normal blood results remain valid. Currently all patients in Ireland undergoing substantial elective surgery requiring general or regional anaesthetic have a preoperative assessment prior to the surgery. Patients have phlebotomy performed as part of this assessment. Patients admitted for elective surgery often have these bloods repeated on the morning of surgery. Objectives To determine if blood investigations taken over a one-year period prior to surgery can be used as a baseline for clinically stable patients undergoing elective surgery. Study design and methods All consecutive day of surgery admission patients >18 years of age undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery in Tallaght Hospital between 1 December 2014 and 1 December 2015 were identified using hospital records. Their blood results in the one-year period prior to surgery were compared to the blood results on the morning of surgery, using a McNemar’s test. A further clinical analysis was performed. Results There was no statistically significant change between blood results from three months prior to the surgery and the morning of surgery (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the blood results remained largely unchanged in the one year prior to surgery. No patient had the operation deferred due to aberrant blood results, following previously normal results prior to surgery. The potential cost-saving of omitting bloods is enormous. Conclusions There appears to be neither a statistical nor clinical benefit to repeating blood tests on the morning of surgery, following normal bloods <3 months in a clinically stable individual.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3