Abstract
In this article, the authors explore the use of graph layout algorithms for visualizing proximity matrices such as those obtained in cultural domain analysis. Traditionally, multidimensional scaling has been used for this purpose. The authors compare the two approaches to identify conditions when each approach is effective. As might be expected, they find that multidimensional scaling shines when the data are of low dimensionality and are compatible with the defining characteristics of Euclidean distances, such as symmetry and triangle inequality constraints. However, when one is working with data that do not fit these criteria, graph layout algorithms do a better job of communicating the structure of the data. In addition, graph layout algorithms lend themselves to interactive use, which can yield a deeper and more accurate understanding of the data.
Reference21 articles.
1. Batagelj, V.
, and
A. Mrvar. 2003. Pajek—Analysis and visualization of large networks. In Graph drawing software, ed.
M. Jünger
and
P. Mutzel
, 77—103.
Berlin
, Germany:
Springer
.
2. ———. 1998. Elicitation techniques for cultural domain analysis. In Enhanced ethnographic methods: Audiovisual techniques, focused group interviews, and elicitation techniques, ed.
J. J. Schensul
,
M. D. LeCompte
,
B. K. Nastasi
, and
S. P. Borgatti
, 115—51.
Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira
.
Cited by
30 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献