Comparisons of Online Recruitment Strategies for Convenience Samples

Author:

Antoun Christopher1,Zhang Chan2,Conrad Frederick G.1,Schober Michael F.3

Affiliation:

1. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

2. School of Journalism, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

3. The New School for Social Research, New York, NY, USA

Abstract

The rise of social media websites (e.g., Facebook) and online services such as Google AdWords and Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) offers new opportunities for researchers to recruit study participants. Although researchers have started to use these emerging methods, little is known about how they perform in terms of cost efficiency and, more importantly, the types of people that they ultimately recruit. Here, we report findings about the performance of four online sources for recruiting iPhone users to participate in a web survey. The findings reveal very different performances between two types of strategies: those that “pull in” online users actively looking for paid work (MTurk workers and Craigslist users) and those that “push out” a recruiting ad to online users engaged in other, unrelated online activities (Google AdWords and Facebook). The pull-method recruits were more cost efficient and committed to the survey task, while the push-method recruits were more demographically diverse.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anthropology

Reference21 articles.

1. Summary Report of the AAPOR Task Force on Non-probability Sampling

2. The viability of crowdsourcing for survey research

3. Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk

4. Amazon's Mechanical Turk

5. Chang L.C., Krosnick J. 2002. A comparison of the random digit dialing telephone survey methodology with Internet survey methodology as implemented by Knowledge Networks and Harris Interactive. Paper presented at the 98th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA, August 28–September 1.

Cited by 97 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3