Affiliation:
1. Duke Marine Lab, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Beaufort, NC, USA
2. Division of Cooperative Science, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany
Abstract
Most studies that apply qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) rely on macro-level data, but an increasing number of studies focus on units of analysis at the micro or meso level (i.e., households, firms, protected areas, communities, or local governments). For such studies, qualitative interview data are often the primary source of information. Yet, so far no procedure is available describing how to calibrate qualitative data as fuzzy sets. The authors propose a technique to do so and illustrate it using examples from a study of Guatemalan local governments. By spelling out the details of this important analytic step, the authors aim at contributing to the growing literature on best practice in QCA.
Reference31 articles.
1. Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research
2. The control of politicians: An economic model
3. Basurto X. 2007. Policy, governance and local institutions for biodiversity conservation in Costa Rica. Unpublished Ph.D. diss., University of Arizona.
4. Basurto X. 2009. The role of cross-scale linkages for maintaining local autonomy: The case of biodiversity conservation in Costa Rica (working paper, Bloomington: Indiana University, workshop in political theory and policy analysis).
5. Comparative Research Design: Case and Variable Selection
Cited by
158 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献