Affiliation:
1. Department of Political Science, University of Oslo
Abstract
This article investigates the relationship between multiethnicity and domestic conflict from 1946 to 1992. Multiethnicity is measured by the size of the largest ethnic group, the number of ethnic groups, the size of the largest ethnic minority group, and ethnic affinities to groups outside the country. Although ethnic heterogeneity is expected to stimulate conflict, other factors may alleviate ethnic tension. Moreover, most countries are heterogeneous in one way or another and yet do not engage in violent conflict. The type of political regime and the socioeconomic level within the country become important here. Using data for two different types of domestic conflict, the article concludes that multiethnicity does increase the propensity of domestic violence, although less so for large-scale conflicts. Such cultural factors seem to have become more important in the post-cold war period. However, the country's political regime and socioeconomic level are more important in predicting domestic conflict.
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science,General Business, Management and Accounting
Cited by
327 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Interviews;Revolutionary Emotions;2024-10-25
2. Conclusion;Revolutionary Emotions;2024-10-25
3. Syria and Saudi Arabia;Revolutionary Emotions;2024-10-25
4. The People Overthrew the Regimes;Revolutionary Emotions;2024-10-25
5. Bringing Identity Back in the “Arab Uprisings”;Revolutionary Emotions;2024-10-25