Patient preferences for active ulcerative colitis treatments and fecal microbiota transplantation

Author:

Marshall Deborah A.1ORCID,MacDonald Karen V.2,Kao Dina3,Bernstein Charles N.4,Kaplan Gilaad G.56,Jijon Humberto5,Hazlewood Glen72,Panaccione Remo58,Nasser Yasmin58,Raman Maitreyi98,Moayyedi Paul10

Affiliation:

1. Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Room 3C58, Health Research Innovation Centre, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada

2. Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

3. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada

4. Section of Gastroenterology, and University of Manitoba IBD Clinical and Research Centre, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada

5. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

6. Department of Medicine and Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

7. Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

8. Snyder Institute for Chronic Diseases, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

9. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine and Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

10. Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

Abstract

Background: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a promising treatment for active ulcerative colitis (UC). Understanding patient preferences can identify treatment features that may impact treatment decisions, improve shared decision-making, and contribute to patient-centered care, which is especially important in the context of novel treatments like FMT. Objectives: We aimed to quantify preferences for active UC treatments, specifically FMT and biologics, and identify patient characteristics associated with different preference patterns. Design: This is a cross-sectional survey study. Methods: We administered a discrete choice experiment (DCE) survey to elicit preferences in a sample of Canadian adults with UC. DCE data were analyzed using a main-effects mixed logit model and used to predict uptake of hypothetical scenarios reflecting alternative combinations of treatment features. Latent class modeling identified heterogeneity in patient preference patterns. Results: Participants’ ( n = 201) mean age was 47.1 years (SD: 14.5 years), 58% were female, and most (84%) had at least some post-secondary education. Almost half were willing to undergo FMT. When considering treatments for active UC, the most important attributes were chance of remission and severity of rare unknown side effects. All else equal, participants were most likely to uptake treatment that involves oral capsules/pills. Participants in the class with the highest utility for chance of remission were younger, had more severe disease, and 58% indicated that they would be willing to undergo FMT. Conclusion: We identified characteristics of UC patients who are more likely to be interested in FMT using preference elicitation methods. Patient-centered care can be enhanced by knowing which patients are more likely to be interested in FMT, potentially improving satisfaction with and adherence to treatments for active UC to maximize the effectiveness of treatment while considering heterogeneity in patient preferences.

Funder

Crohn’s and Colitis Canada

University of Calgary

Canadian Institute of Health Research

McMaster University

Alberta Innovates

University of Alberta

Queen’s University

Dalhousie University

Takeda Pharmaceutical Company

Montreal Heart Institute Research Centre

Allergan Incorporated

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3