Assessment of Axillary Lymph Nodes for Metastasis on Ultrasound Using Artificial Intelligence

Author:

Tahmasebi Aylin1ORCID,Qu Enze12,Sevrukov Alexander1,Liu Ji-Bin1,Wang Shuo1,Lyshchik Andrej1,Yu Joshua1,Eisenbrey John R.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA

2. Department of Ultrasound, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate an artificial intelligence (AI) system for the classification of axillary lymph nodes on ultrasound compared to radiologists. Ultrasound images of 317 axillary lymph nodes from patients referred for ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration or core needle biopsy and corresponding pathology findings were collected. Lymph nodes were classified into benign and malignant groups with histopathological result serving as the reference. Google Cloud AutoML Vision (Mountain View, CA) was used for AI image classification. Three experienced radiologists also classified the images and gave a level of suspicion score (1–5). To test the accuracy of AI, an external testing dataset of 64 images from 64 independent patients was evaluated by three AI models and the three readers. The diagnostic performance of AI and the humans were then quantified using receiver operating characteristics curves. In the complete set of 317 images, AutoML achieved a sensitivity of 77.1%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 77.1%, and an area under the precision recall curve of 0.78, while the three radiologists showed a sensitivity of 87.8% ± 8.5%, specificity of 50.3% ± 16.4%, PPV of 61.1% ± 5.4%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 84.1% ± 6.6%, and accuracy of 67.7% ± 5.7%. In the three external independent test sets, AI and human readers achieved sensitivity of 74.0% ± 0.14% versus 89.9% ± 0.06% ( p = .25), specificity of 64.4% ± 0.11% versus 50.1 ± 0.20% ( p = .22), PPV of 68.3% ± 0.04% versus 65.4 ± 0.07% ( p = .50), NPV of 72.6% ± 0.11% versus 82.1% ± 0.08% ( p = .33), and accuracy of 69.5% ± 0.06% versus 70.1% ± 0.07% ( p = .90), respectively. These preliminary results indicate AI has comparable performance to trained radiologists and could be used to predict the presence of metastasis in ultrasound images of axillary lymph nodes.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3