Affiliation:
1. Department of Biomedical Engineering Wright State University Dayton, OH 45435
2. Biodynamics Research Unit Department of Physiology and Biophysics Mayo Clinic/Foundation Rochester, MN 55905
Abstract
Global and local attenuation coefficient estimates were calculated using three methods: the envelope peak method, the central-frequency-downshift method, and the zero-crossing method. The results show that for each method the error of the local estimate with respect to the global estimate is increased as the sample volume is decreased. While the performances of the latter two methods are comparable, the performance of the envelope peak method is significantly superior.
Subject
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献