How has academia responded to the urgent needs created by COVID-19? A multi-level global, regional and national analysis

Author:

Zhao Wenjing1ORCID,Zhang Lin2ORCID,Wang Junling3,Wang Lili4

Affiliation:

1. Center for Studies of Information Resources, School of Information Management, Wuhan University, P.R. China; Center for Science, Technology & Education Assessment (CSTEA), Wuhan University, P.R. China

2. Center for Studies of Information Resources, School of Information Management, Wuhan University, P.R. China; Center for Science, Technology & Education Assessment (CSTEA), Wuhan University, P.R. China; Centre for R&D Monitoring (ECOOM) and Department of MSI, KU Leuven, Belgium

3. Department of Computer Science, ETH Zurich, Switzerland

4. UNU-MERIT, Maastricht University, The Netherlands

Abstract

In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, gaining insights into how academia has responded to this urgent challenge is of great significance. This article presents academic response patterns at a global, regional and national level from an analysis of publication volume versus reported cases of COVID-19, scientific collaboration and research focus. We also compare academic activity associated with this newly emerging infection to that related to long-standing infections. Our results show that the research community has responded quickly to COVID-19. The highly developed countries, which have the highest number of confirmed cases, are also the major academic contributors. National-level analysis reveals diverse response patterns from different countries. Specifically, academic research in the United Kingdom remained at a relatively constant level throughout the whole year (2020), while the global share of China’s research output was prone to shift as its domestic pandemic status changed. Strong alliances have formed among countries with academic capabilities in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The distribution of disciplines is relatively decentralised, indicating that a diverse and broad knowledge base contributes to the COVID-19 literature. Most of the analysed countries show dynamic patterns of research focus that vary over time as the pandemic evolves, except India. As one of the world’s biggest suppliers of vaccines, India makes consistent efforts on vaccine research, especially those related to pharmaceutical preparations. Our findings may serve as resources for fostering strategies to respond to future threats of pandemics.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference81 articles.

1. Lederer EM. UN chief says COVID-19 is worst crisis since World War II, https://apnews.com/article/asia-pacific-united-nations-virus-outbreak-financial-markets-us-news-dd1b9502802f03f88d56c34f7d95270c (2020, accessed 15 May 2021).

2. Kovacevic M, Jahic A. COVID-19 and human development: exploring global preparedness and vulnerability, https://datastudio.google.com/reporting/abd4128c-7d8d-4411-b49a-ac04ab074e69/page/QYXLB (2020, accessed 19 July 2021).

3. Conceição P. COVID-19 and the human development crisis: what have we learnt? https://oecd-development-matters.org/2020/09/01/covid-19-and-the-human-development-crisis-what-have-we-learnt/ (2020, accessed 15 June 2021).

4. Bibliometric analysis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) literature published in Web of Science 2019–2020

5. Bibliometric analysis of global scientific research on COVID-19

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3