Think outside the search box: A comparative study of visual and form-based query builders

Author:

Svarre Tanja1,Russell-Rose Tony2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Communication and Psychology, Aalborg University, Denmark

2. Goldsmiths, University of London, UK

Abstract

Knowledge workers such as healthcare information professionals, legal researchers and librarians need to create and execute search strategies that are comprehensive, transparent and reproducible. The traditional solution is to use proprietary query-building tools provided by literature database vendors. In the majority of cases, these query builders are designed using a form-based paradigm that requires the user to enter keywords and ontology terms on a line-by-line basis and then combine them using Boolean operators. However, recent years have witnessed significant changes in human–computer interaction technologies, and users can now engage with online information systems using a variety of novel data visualisation techniques. In this article, we evaluate a new approach to query building in which users express concepts as objects on a visual canvas and compare this with a traditional form-based query builder in a laboratory-based user study. The results demonstrate the potential of visual interfaces to mitigate some of the shortcomings associated with form-based interfaces and encourage more exploratory search behaviour. They also demonstrate the value of having a temporary ‘scratch’ space in query formulation. In addition, the findings highlight an ongoing need for transparency and reproducibility in professional search and raise further questions about how these properties may best be supported.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference33 articles.

1. Searching for Studies

2. How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis

3. Pazer JW. The importance of the Boolean search query in social media monitoring tools, 2013, https://www.dragon360.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/social-media-monitoring-tools-boolean-search-query.pdf

4. Russell-Rose T, MacFarlane A. Towards explainability in professional search. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on explainable recommendation and search, Xi’an, China, 30 July 2020, https://ears2020.github.io/accept_papers/1.pdf

5. Elsweiler D, Wilson ML, Harvey M. Searching for fun: casual-leisure search. In: Proceedings of the ECIR 2012 workshop on task-based and aggregated search (TBAS2012)Barcelona, 1 April 2012, https://www.cs.nott.ac.uk/~pszmw/s4f2014/ecir_searchingforfun.pdf

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The Evolution of Web Search User Interfaces - An Archaeological Analysis of Google Search Engine Result Pages;Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval;2023-03-19

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3