Use of 'leading-edge' information systems by academic chemists in the UK: part II. Constraints and the need for usability engineering

Author:

Philip G.1

Affiliation:

1. The Queen's University of Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK

Abstract

The purpose of this project has been to investigate the current use of automated chemical information systems by academic chemists in the UK. More specifically, it was concerned with the use of advanced information systems, which we refer to as 'leading-edge' systems, rather than online bibliographic databases. These include structure-based reaction indexing and synthesis planning systems, spectral databases, X-ray diffraction databases, molecular modelling systems, prop erty prediction systems, etc. To this end, chemistry staff at 26 UK universities were surveyed using a combination of telephone interviews and a postal questionnaire. With the exception of the chemistry staff at the Queen's University of Belfast, there was no duplication of the sample population in the two modes of survey. In part I in this series, we have described the findings of a preliminary telephone survey and, in this paper (part II), we will discuss the results of a detailed postal questionnaire survey. The sample in this case consisted of 16 universities, which were selected based on research rating categories and geographic locations and which produced a response of 57%. This enabled us to create an extensive profile of chemists and their use of various 'leading-edge' systems. According to this survey, around 60% of respondents are currently making use of 'leading-edge' systems, which is much higher than what we found in the telephone survey (39%). However, this discrepancy is due to the bias of the respondents in the postal survey towards those who are users of information systems. Since the telephone survey involved almost 100% staff in each department, it is a more reliable measure of the extent of use of 'leading-edge' systems by academics. The postal survey also investigated the reasons for the current low customer base for these systems. These include factors such as cost, training, computer literacy, technical support and usability issues, including 'gaps' in information provision. Based on the results, we have also investigated the use of 'leading-edge' systems in relation to: (i) research produc tivity of departments as measured by the Universities Funding Council's (UFC) research assessment exercise and (ii) subject specialisation of chemists (via organic, inor ganic, physical and analytical). It was found that those departments which received a higher research rating (3, 4 or 5) in the last UFC rating are also more progressive in the use of 'leading-edge' systems. The figures ranged from 38.5% for a department with a rating of 2, to 80% for a department which received a top rating of 5. Further statis tical analysis, however, showed only a small correlation, perhaps not very significant, between the two factors. Regarding subject specialisation, our results confirmed the findings of the telephone survey; namely, organic and inor ganic chemists make more use of these systems than phys ical chemists. This is because most of the currently available 'leading-edge' systems are srtucture-based and therefore are of less use to physical chemists whose infor mation need has an alphanumeric format. The paper concludes with a number of recommendations to promote the increased use of information systems by academic chemists in the UK and elsewhere.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3