Digital health information provision and health outcomes

Author:

Nicholas David1,Huntington Paul2,Williams Peter2,Blackburn Paul2

Affiliation:

1. City University, London, UK,

2. City University, London, UK

Abstract

An online questionnaire survey of more than 1,000 users of a consumer health website, SurgeryDoor, was conducted, which sought to discover why the site was consulted and whether the information obtained from it had any health outcome. The majority of respondents were women and middle aged. Doctors were the first port of call for information, but 50% of respondents cited the Internet as one of their top three information sources. Most people did not come to the site with a particular illness or medical condition. Two-thirds of users said that the information found had ‘helped a lot’ in being better informed. Just under half felt that the information they found had helped in their dealings with the doctor, while just over half felt that information found had changed the way they felt about their condition. More importantly, over one-third of respondents said that their condition had improved after having visited the site and more than one in four said that Web information had resulted in a deferred visit or had actually replaced a visit to the doctor.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference27 articles.

1. [3] New York Times (1997) nytsyn.com/live/week/178_062797_16001217232.html (not publicly accessible; quoted in [4]).

Cited by 30 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Innovations in Health Care—A Conceptual Framework;International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health;2021-09-24

2. Online Health Searches and Their Perceived Effects on Patients and Patient-Clinician Relationships: ASystematic Review;The American Journal of Medicine;2018-10

3. Contemporary Developments in e-Health;Theories to Inform Superior Health Informatics Research and Practice;2018

4. Leveraging the Power of e-Health to Achieve Healthcare Outcomes;Healthcare Delivery in the Information Age;2016

5. Iranian Women’s Experiences of Health Information Seeking Barriers: A Qualitative Study in Kerman;Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal;2015-02-21

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3