Framing of different types of information needs within simulated work task situations: An empirical study in the school context

Author:

Borlund Pia1

Affiliation:

1. University of Copenhagen, Royal School of Library and Information Science, Denmark

Abstract

This paper reports a meta-evaluation of how to frame different types of information needs within simulated work task situations. This is done via an empirical study of teenagers and their teachers’ Internet information searching. Two sets of simulated work task situations were carefully designed to reflect verificative, conscious topical and muddled topical information needs of each group of test participants. The study shows that it is challenging to formulate verificative simulated work task situations and to incorporate curiosity in the muddled topical simulated work task situations. The results also show that the search behaviour of the two groups differs across the information needs, as expected, but also between the two groups, owing to the search strategy and attitude of the teenagers. This is seen by how fast they were at searching and assessing relevance, often using Google’s ‘picture search function’, and saving the reading in detail for later.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Constructing and meta-evaluating state-aware evaluation metrics for interactive search systems;Information Retrieval Journal;2023-10-31

2. The elusive search engine: How search engine use is reflected in survey reports;Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology;2023-08-08

3. Formally Modeling Users in Information Retrieval;A Behavioral Economics Approach to Interactive Information Retrieval;2023

4. The Effects of Domain and Search Expertise on Learning Outcomes in Digital Library Use;ACM SIGIR Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval;2022-03-14

5. Use of mind mapping in search process to clarify information needs and improve search satisfaction;Journal of Information Science;2021-12-13

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3