Identifying effective cognitive biases in information retrieval

Author:

Gomroki Gisoo1,Behzadi Hassan1ORCID,Fattahi Rahmatolloah1,Salehi Fadardi Javad1

Affiliation:

1. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify the types of cognitive biases in the process of information retrieval. This research used a mixed-method approach for data collection. The research population consisted of 25 information retrieval specialists and 30 post-graduate students. We employed three tools for collecting data, including a checklist, log files and semi-structured interviews. The findings showed that from the perspective of information retrieval specialists, the cognitive biases such as ‘Familiarity’, ‘Anchoring’, ‘Rush to solve’ and ‘Curse of knowledge’ could be of the greatest importance in the field of information retrieval. Also, in terms of users’ searching, the ‘Rush to solve problems’ and ‘Mere exposure effects’ biases have the highest frequency, and the ‘Outcome’ and ‘Curse of knowledge’ biases have the lowest frequency in the process of user retrieval information. It can be concluded that, because cognitive biases occurring in information retrieval, designers of information retrieval systems and librarians should pay attention to this issue in designing and evaluating information systems.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference34 articles.

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Cognitively Biased Users Interacting with Algorithmically Biased Results in Whole-Session Search on Debated Topics;Proceedings of the 2024 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval;2024-08-02

2. Understanding users' dynamic perceptions of search gain and cost in sessions: An expectation confirmation model;Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology;2024-06-17

3. A framework to support experimentation in the context of Cognitive Biases in Search as a Learning process;Proceedings of the 20th Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems;2024-05-20

4. Cognitive Biases in Fact-Checking and Their Countermeasures: A Review;Information Processing & Management;2024-05

5. Behavioural economics theories in information-seeking behaviour research: A systematic review;Journal of Librarianship and Information Science;2023-12-31

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3