The Natural History of Bacterial Colonization of the Newborn in a Maternity Hospital (Part I)

Author:

McAllister T. A.1,Givan J.1,Black A.1,Turner M. J.1,Kerr M. M.1,Hutchison J. H.1

Affiliation:

1. The University Department of Child Health and the Department of Bacteriology The Queen Mother's Hospital, Glasgow

Abstract

Bacteriological examinations were performed on 1103 infants to determine the ages at which the newborn are colonized at different sites by bacteria, and with which organisms. On the day of birth, specimens for culture included aspirated gastric contents, and swabs from nose, throat, groin and rectum; on Day 3 the umbilical cord clamp with a section of the cord, swabs from nose, throat, groin and rectum; on days 5 and 1, and weekly thereafter, swabs from the same 4 sites. These examinations included identification of the individual bacterial species. The mass of information so obtained was analysed by computer. The high level of bacterial colonization by day 3 was striking and, indeed, large numbers of potential pathogens were grown from infants within one hour of birth. Staphylococcus aureus was found only in very small numbers of infants, e.g. only 2.6 per cent of infants' umbilical cords on day 3, and 4 per cent of infants' noses on day 7. If the levels of colonization reflect the risks of infection, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ranks close to Staph. aureus in the newborn nursery of the modern maternity hospital. Forty two different species of bacteria were isolated from these infants of which 24 were potential pathogens and of the latter, gram-negative organisms greatly outnumbered the gram-positive. This high incidence of gram-negative colonization in a large series of hospitalized neonates may be a normal phenomenon but it suggests that the risk of infection is today greater with gram-negative than with gram-positive bacteria. The figures for carriage of pathogenic staphylococci in the present investigation contrast markedly with the figures reported by many workers between 1950 and 1960.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 26 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3