Guess the weight: the accuracy of estimated weight for surgical admissions – a comparison study

Author:

Thomas Rachel AB1,Empey Julie-Ann2,Seth Subodh3,Crozier Joseph4

Affiliation:

1. Specialty Registrar, Department of Surgery, Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Larbert, UK

2. Foundation Doctor, Department of Surgery, Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Larbert, UK

3. Associate Specialist, Department of Surgery, Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Larbert, UK

4. Consultant, Department of Surgery, Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Larbert, UK

Abstract

Background and aims An accurate body weight is vital for safe dosing of many drugs. Weight is often unavailable for emergency admissions and an estimation is used. Emergency Department staff are poor at estimating patient weight, but no data existed for surgical admissions. This study assesses the reliability of weight estimation by patients and healthcare workers. Methods and results All emergency surgical patients admitted during one week were approached. If consented, four healthcare workers (consultant, foundation doctor, nurse, support worker) independently estimated their weight. The patients then gave their estimate. Actual weight was measured and data analysed. Seventy-two consecutive surgical admissions were included, aged 16–95 and 52% male. Healthcare workers correctly (within ±10% margin) estimated the weight for only 57% of patients. Further statistical analysis confirmed that staff are inaccurate estimators and patients are better at estimating their own weight (p < 0.006). Conclusions Staff are poor at estimating weight and the study was unable to show statistical superiority of any professional group when guessing weights. There was also a tendency for staff to increasingly under-estimate as weight increases. Patients are the most accurate estimators, but self-reporting is still too unreliable for drug dosing and should stop.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3