Failure to Thrive and the Risk of Child Abuse: A Prospective Population Survey

Author:

Skuse David H1,Gill Dorothy1,Reilly Sheena1,Wolke Dieter2,Lynch Margaret A3

Affiliation:

1. Behavioural Sciences Unit, Institute of Child Health, London WC1N 1EH, United Kingdom

2. Division of Psychology, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield ALIO 9AB, United Kingdom

3. Newcomen Centre, Guy's Hospital, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom

Abstract

Objective — To identify the relative importance of failure to thrive during infancy as a risk factor for later abuse or neglect. Design — Whole population birth cohort (1 January to 31 December 1986) studied prospectively over a four year period. Setting — An inner city health district in London, England. Subjects — 2609 births, of whom 47 were identified as having non-organic failure to thrive by first birthday. Main outcome measures — Registration on Child Protection Register, or subject to investigation of suspected abuse or neglect without registration. Results — 2·5% (64) of birth cohort had been placed on the Child Protection Register during the period 1986–1990, and a further 1·2% (32) had been a cause for concern. The relative risk attributable to nonorganic failure to thrive was 4·3 (95% CI 1·65 to 11·94) and exceeded other measured risk factors, including birth weight <2500g, 1·96 (95% CI 1·01 to 3·82); gestation <35 weeks, 3·26 (95% CI 1·32 to 3·75); ordinal position >4, 1·53 (95% CI 0·72 to 3·23). A multiple logistic regression confirmed the independent contribution of non-organic failure to thrive to subsequent poor parenting warranting professional intervention. Conclusions — Early postnatal non-organic failure to thrive is a risk factor for later serious parenting deficiencies, but previous research has overstated its importance. Within the community studied the nature of subsequent risk was (non-nutritional) neglect, rather than non-accidental injury. More than eight out of 10 cases do not give further cause for concern.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3