Participation rates for organized colorectal cancer screening programmes: an international comparison

Author:

Klabunde Carrie1,Blom Johannes2,Bulliard Jean-Luc3,Garcia Montse4,Hagoel Lea5,Mai Verna6,Patnick Julietta7,Rozjabek Heather8,Senore Carlo9,Törnberg Sven10

Affiliation:

1. Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA

2. Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

3. Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, Division of Chronic Diseases, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland

4. Cancer Prevention and Control Program, IDIBELL, Catalan Institute of Oncology, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain

5. Department of Community Medicine and Epidemiology, The Faculty of Medicine, Technion, and Carmel Medical Center Haifa, Israel

6. Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, Canada

7. NHS Cancer Screening Programmes, Public Health England, Sheffield, UK

8. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Drexel University School of Public Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

9. Centro di Prevenzione Oncologica Piemonte, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy

10. Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet and Regional Cancer Centre Stockholm Gotland, Sweden

Abstract

Objective Participation, an indicator of screening programme acceptance and effectiveness, varies widely in clinical trials and population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programmes. We aimed to assess whether CRC screening participation rates can be compared across organized guaiac fecal occult blood test (G-FOBT)/fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based programmes, and what factors influence these rates. Methods Programme representatives from countries participating in the International Cancer Screening Network were surveyed to describe their G-FOBT/FIT-based CRC screening programmes, how screening participation is defined and measured, and to provide participation data for their most recent completed screening round. Results Information was obtained from 15 programmes in 12 countries. Programmes varied in size, reach, maturity, target age groups, exclusions, type of test kit, method of providing test kits and use, and frequency of reminders. Coverage by invitation ranged from 30–100%, coverage by the screening programme from 7–67.7%, overall uptake/participation rate from 7–67.7%, and first invitation participation from 7–64.3%. Participation rates generally increased with age and were higher among women than men and for subsequent compared with first invitation participation. Conclusion Comparisons among CRC screening programmes should be made cautiously, given differences in organization, target populations, and interpretation of indicators. More meaningful comparisons are possible if rates are calculated across a uniform age range, by gender, and separately for people invited for the first time vs. previously.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3