Barrett's Oesophagus Surveillance versus endoscopy at need Study (BOSS): protocol and analysis plan for a multicentre randomized controlled trial

Author:

Old Oliver1,Moayyedi Paul2,Love Sharon3,Roberts Corran3,Hapeshi Julie1,Foy Chris1,Stokes Clive1,Briggs Andrew4,Jankowski Janusz5,Barr Hugh1,

Affiliation:

1. Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, Great Western Road, Gloucester, GL1 3NN

2. Division of Gastroenterology, McMaster University Medical Centre, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8N 3Z5

3. Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Botnar Research Centre, Windmill Road, Oxford, OX3 7LD

4. University of Glasgow, Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Health & Wellbeing, 1 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow G12 8RZ

5. University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, University of Warwick, Warwickshire, CV2 2DX

Abstract

Objectives The absolute annual risk of patients with Barrett's oesophagus (BO) developing oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) is ≤0.5%. Screening BO patients for malignant progression using endoscopic surveillance is widely practised. To assess the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of this, we developed a protocol for a randomized controlled trial of surveillance versus ‘at need’ endoscopy. Methods In a multicentre trial, 3400 BO patients randomized to either 2-yearly endoscopic surveillance or ‘at need’ endoscopy will be followed up for 10 years. Urgent endoscopy will be offered to all patients who develop symptoms of dysphagia, unexplained weight loss >7lb (3.2kg), iron deficiency anaemia, recurrent vomiting, or worsening upper gastrointestinal symptoms. Participants must have endoscopically and histologically confirmed BO, with circumferential BO ≥1cm or maximal tongue/island length ≥2 cm. Candidates with existing oesophageal high-grade dysplasia or cancer, or previous upper gastrointestinal cancer will be excluded. Primary outcome will be overall survival. Secondary outcomes will be cost effectiveness (cost per life year saved and quality adjusted life years); cancer-specific survival; time to OAC diagnosis and stage at diagnosis; morbidity and mortality related to any interventions; and frequency of endoscopy. Conclusions This randomized trial will provide data to evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of screening BO patients for OAC.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Cited by 51 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Detection and surveillance of neoplastic lesions of the esophagus: application of guidelines and techniques;Annals of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery;2023-10

2. How well are patients with Barrett’s esophagus treated in the UK: the gap in management;Annals of Esophagus;2023-09

3. Unmet needs in Barret’s esophagus diagnosis and treatment: a narrative review;Translational Gastroenterology and Hepatology;2023-07

4. Barrett’s Esophagus: When to Scope and When to Ablate;Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology;2023-06-08

5. Cancer Risk in Barrett’s Esophagus: A Clinical Review;International Journal of Molecular Sciences;2023-03-23

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3