Use of research questionnaires in the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England: impact on screening uptake

Author:

Watson Joanna1,Shaw Keith1,MacGregor Maria1,Smith Steve2,Halloran Stephen3,Patnick Julietta14,Beral Valerie1,Green Jane1,

Affiliation:

1. Cancer Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Oxford OX3 7LF

2. Midlands and North West Bowel Cancer Screening Hub, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Hospital of St Cross, Barby Road Rugby CV22 5PX

3. NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme - Southern Hub, Royal Surrey County Hospital & University of Surrey, The Leggett Building, Guildford GU2 7WG

4. NHS Cancer Screening Programmes, Fulwood House, Old Fulwood Road, Sheffield S10 3TH

Abstract

Background The NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England offers biennial screening to those aged 60-74 using a faecal occult blood test (FOBt) sent by post. Data from this national clinical programme can also be used for research. Awareness of the impact of such studies on screening participation is important. Aims To investigate the effect on screening uptake of adding a research questionnaire to the postal screening invitation. Methods People invited for screening in 2008–10 in two areas of England were randomized to receive or not to receive an additional research study questionnaire, consent form and study information, either with their test kit or 2-3 days later. Uptake of screening was examined in relation to study mailings. Results Among 11,579 people invited for screening by the Midlands and North West Bowel Cancer Screening Hub, screening uptake was significantly lower in those who received study documents with their FOBt kit than in those who did not (48.6% vs 53.5% respectively: p < 0.001). The reduction in uptake was similar in men and women, and was greater in people living in more deprived areas. Among a further 36,195 people invited for screening by the Midlands and North West and Southern Hubs, sending study documents by separate mailing 2–3 days after the FOBt kit did not affect screening uptake (uptake with and without additional study mailing: Midlands and North West, 56.7% and 56.2% respectively, p = 0.6; Southern, 52.0% and 51.4% respectively, p = 0.5). Conclusions Researchers planning studies that include contact with potential participants within the NHS Bowel Cancer and similar screening programmes should be aware of the potential impact on uptake.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3