Early detection of breast cancer rectifies inequality of breast cancer outcomes

Author:

Tabár László1,Chen Tony Hsiu-Hsi2,Yen Amy Ming-Fang3,Dean Peter B4,Smith Robert A5,Jonsson Håkan6,Törnberg Sven7,Chen Sam Li-Sheng3,Chiu Sherry Yueh-Hsia8,Fann Jean Ching-Yuan9,Ku May Mei-Sheng2,Wu Wendy Yi-Ying6,Hsu Chen-Yang2,Chen Yu-Ching2,Svane Gunilla7,Azavedo Edward7,Grundström Helene10,Sundén Per10,Leifland Karin11,Frodis Ewa12,Ramos Joakim12,Epstein Birgitta13,Åkerlund Anders14,Sundbom Ann15,Bordás Pál16,Wallin Hans17,Starck Leena17,Björkgren Annika18,Carlson Stina18,Fredriksson Irma7,Ahlgren Johan19,Öhman Daniel7,Holmberg Lars20,Duffy Stephen W21ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Falun Central Hospital, Falun, Sweden

2. National Taiwan University, Taipei City

3. Taipei Medical University, Taipei City

4. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland

5. American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA

6. Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden

7. Regional Cancer Center Stockholm Gotland, Stockholm, Sweden

8. Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City

9. Kainan University, Taoyuan City

10. Danderyd Hospital, Danderyd, Sweden

11. Sankt Göran Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

12. Västerås Central Hospital, Västerås, Sweden

13. Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden

14. Central Hospital, Gävle, Sweden

15. Karlstad Central Hospital, Karlstad, Sweden

16. Sunderby Hospital, Department of Radiology, Norrbotten County, Sweden

17. Sundsvall Hospital, Sundsvall, Sweden

18. Norrlands University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden

19. Regional Cancer Center, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden

20. Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden and Translational Oncology & Urology Research (TOUR), School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom

21. Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

Abstract

Objectives To explain apparent differences among mammography screening services in Sweden using individual data on participation in screening and with breast cancer–specific survival as an outcome. Methods We analysed breast cancer survival data from the Swedish Cancer Register on breast cancer cases from nine Swedish counties diagnosed in women eligible for screening. Data were available on 38,278 breast cancers diagnosed and 4312 breast cancer deaths. Survival to death from breast cancer was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier estimate, for all cases in each county, and separately for cases of women participating and not participating in their last invitation to screening. Formal statistical comparisons of survival were made using proportional hazards regression. Results All counties showed a reduction in the hazard of breast cancer death with participation in screening, but the reductions for individual counties varied substantially, ranging from 51% (95% confidence interval 46–55%) to 81% (95% confidence interval 74–85%). Survival rates in nonparticipating women ranged from 53% (95% confidence interval 40–65%) to 74% (95% confidence interval 72–77%), while the corresponding survival in women participating in screening varied from 80% (95% confidence interval 77–84%) to 86% (95% confidence interval 83–88%), a considerably narrower range. Conclusions Differences among counties in the effect of screening on breast cancer outcomes were mainly due to variation in survival in women not participating in screening. Screening conferred similarly high survival rates in all counties. This indicates that the performance of screening services was similar across counties and that detection and treatment of breast cancer in early-stage reduces inequalities in breast cancer outcome.

Funder

Bröstcancerföreningarnas Riksorganisation

American Cancer Society through a gift from the Longaberger Company’s Horizon of Hope Campaign®

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3