Screening Status in Relation to Biological and Chronological Characteristics of Breast Cancers: A Cross Sectional Survey

Author:

Alexander Freda E1,Anderson Thomas J2,Hubbard Alexandra L2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Public Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Medical School, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, United Kingdom

2. Department of Pathology, The University of Edinburgh, Medical School, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, United Kingdom

Abstract

Objective— To determine the pathological and biological characteristics of breast cancers diagnosed by screening and examined at the Edinburgh University pathology department. Methods— These cancers were classified by screening status: never screened (n=111), prevalence screen detected (n=105), and previously screened (n=74). The last category arose in women who had been regularly screened during the trial; the cancers were diagnosed as interval cases before the first invitation to service screening (n=33) or were incidence screen detected at that time (n=41). Results— Association (for operable invasive cancers, n=250) of cancer characteristics with screening status reflects influences of biology (aggressiveness) or chronology (time of diagnosis), or both. The prognostic indicators tumour grade, histological type, and oestrogen receptor status were found in a smaller percentage of the patients with poor prognosis among the prevalence screen detected cases (9%, 77%, 18%) than among those previously screened (29%, 84%, 35%). The chronological factors size and node status were found in a smaller percentage of patients with poor prognosis among women previously screened (31%, 24%) than among those never screened (62%, 39%)). Apart from these two, no other factors improved the diagnosis in the previously screened group compared with the never screened group. Conclusions— These results suggest that favourable characteristics of screen detected cases are often due to the effects of length bias on “biological factors” and fail to show that current local screening practice has succeeded in advancing the diagnosis of breast cancers to a less aggressive phase.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Screening for breast cancer with mammography;Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews;2013-06-04

2. Screening for breast cancer with mammography;Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews;2011-01-19

3. Prognosis and pathology of screen-detected carcinomas;Cancer;2010-11-02

4. Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study to Refine Management Recommendations for Women at Elevated Familial Risk of Breast Cancer: The EVA Trial;Journal of Clinical Oncology;2010-03-20

5. Screening for breast cancer with mammography;Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews;2009-10-07

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3