The effects of a UK review of Breast Cancer Screening on Uptake: An observational before/after study

Author:

Taylor-Phillips Sian1,O'Sullivan Emma2,Kearins Olive3,Parsons Helen4,Clarke Aileen5

Affiliation:

1. NIHR postdoctoral research fellow, Warwick Medical School, The University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL

2. Breast Screening Deputy QA Coordinator, NHS Cancer Screening Programmes, Public Health Building, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT

3. Regional Director of Breast Screening Quality Assurance, NHS Cancer Screening Programmes, Public Health Building, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT

4. Research Fellow in Medical Statistics, Warwick Medical School, The University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL

5. Professor of Public Health and Health Services Research, Warwick Medical School, The University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL

Abstract

Objectives To measure whether uptake of breast cancer screening was affected by the publication of the Marmot Review and associated press coverage. Setting Eight NHS breast screening centres in the West Midlands of the UK. Methods Uptake of breast cancer screening invitations was compared in the week before and after the Marmot review publication. All 12,023 women invited for screening between 23 October 2012 and 5 November 2012 were included. A mixed effects model of the predictors of screening uptake (on date invited, or within 21 days) was created. Predictors considered for inclusion were whether the allocated screening appointment was before or after publication of the review, population factors (age, index of multiple deprivation income domain by quintile, previous attendance), and interaction terms. Results Uptake decreased after publication of the review from 65% to 62% (OR = 0.87 95%CI = 0.80–0.94), but a similar decrease was seen for the same dates on the previous year (OR = 0.85 95%CI = 0.78–0.93). Odds of attending screening were lower for women in the most deprived (uptake = 49%, OR = 0.54, 95%CI = 0.46–0.62) in comparison with the least deprived quintile (uptake = 71%). Odds of attendance also increased if the woman had ever previously attended (OR 3.9 95% CI 3.5–4.4), and decreased with each year of increasing age (OR 0.96 95% CI 0.96–0.97). There were no interactions between any of the other predictors and whether the appointment was before or after publication of the Marmot review. Conclusion No change in uptake of breast cancer screening above normal seasonal variation was detected after publication of the Marmot review.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3