Participation in faecal immunochemical testing-based colorectal cancer screening programmes in the northwest of Europe

Author:

Toes-Zoutendijk Esther1ORCID,Portillo Isabel2,Hoeck Sarah34,de Brabander Isabel5,Perrin Philippe6,Dubois Catherine7,van Leerdam Monique8,Lansdorp-Vogelaar Iris1,Bardou Marc89

Affiliation:

1. Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

2. The Basque Health Service, Bilbao, Spain

3. Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium

4. Centre for Cancer Detection, Brugge, Belgium

5. Belgian Cancer Registry, Brussels, Belgium

6. Association pour le déspistage du Cancer Colorectal en Alsace (ADECA), Colmar, France

7. Centre Pyradec, Pau, France

8. Gastroenterology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

9. Clinical Investigation Center INSERM 1432, Dijon-Bourgogne University Hospital, Dijon, France

Abstract

Objective This study compared the participation in four faecal immunochemical testing-based screening programmes for colorectal cancer in Flanders, France, Basque country and the Netherlands, to identify factors to further optimize faecal immunochemical testing programmes. Method Background information and data on performance indicators were collected and compared for the four programmes. Results Invitation method, reminders, funding, faecal immunochemical testing cut-off and follow-up after positive faecal immunochemical testing differed in the four programmes. In France, only an invitation letter is sent by mail, while the sample kit must be collected from the general practitioner. In the other programmes, an invitation letter including the sample kit is sent by mail. Participation rates vary substantially according to the method of invitation, with the highest participation rates in the Netherlands (73.0%) and Basque country (72.4%), followed by Flanders (54.5%) and France (28.6%). Basque country (92.8%) and France (88.4%), the two programmes with most active involvement of general practitioners in referral for colonoscopy, had the highest participation rates for colonoscopy. Conclusions Large differences in screening participation observed between programmes according to the invitation method used suggest that changes to the design of the programme, such as including the sample kit with the invitation, or active involvement of GPs, might increase participation.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3