Affiliation:
1. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
2. Cornell ILR, Ithaca, NY, USA
3. Pennsylvania State University, PA, USA
Abstract
This paper profiles and explores variations in the nature and extent to which community workforce provisions have been effectively negotiated into Project Labor Agreements (PLAs). Community Workforce Agreements broadly aim to advance employment and career models for demographic groups underrepresented in the construction industry but have implications for coalition building and may facilitate a broader role for labor in long-term economic development. These arrangements are the focus of intense policy and research debate, where the issue of using PLAs on publicly funded projects has long been considered. However, the types of provisions regularly included in these PLAs, and the manner in which these provisions vary by geography, time, and size of the Building and Construction Trades Council, are not well understood. This paper profiles the most common provisions and their variability and briefly touches on outcome effects of these agreements to communities, using a content analysis of 185 negotiated agreements over fourteen years, a survey of over 300 building trades councils, and three case studies from projects in Washington, D.C., Cleveland, and New York.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Industrial relations
Reference14 articles.
1. Belman Dale, Bodah Matthew M. 2010. Building better: A look at best practices for the design of project labor agreements. Economic Policy Institute briefing paper no. 273, Economic Policy Institute, Washington, DC.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献