An evaluation of patient informed consent for dental extractions

Author:

Arya Richa1,Jadun Sarah2,Shah Aneesha3

Affiliation:

1. Dental Core Trainee, King’s College Hospital, London, UK

2. SpR in Oral Surgery, King’s College Hospital Dental Institute, London, UK

3. Consultant Oral Surgeon, Department of Oral Surgery, King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

Abstract

Dental practitioners are well versed in informing patients of the risks and benefits associated with dental extractions. The purpose of this service evaluation was to determine whether patients understood and recalled information relevant to their planned oral surgery procedure, prior to second stage consent. A questionnaire was distributed to patients who were attending for their elective treatment appointment. This explored their ability to recall the planned intervention, the modality of treatment (local anaesthetic, intravenous sedation, or general anaesthetic), understanding of alternative treatment options and the risks associated with the procedure. Completed responses were received from 29 of the distributed questionnaires (response rate=58%). The majority of patients were not aware of the following risks with their procedure: pain, bleeding, bruising, swelling, infection, damage to adjacent structures. Despite a well-documented consent form and comprehensive discussion, we identified that patients may not comprehend or recollect the risks associated with their dental extraction. As dental professionals we have a duty to seek ways to facilitate patient understanding and maximise their autonomy.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

Reference19 articles.

1. Informed consent: how much and what do patients understand?

2. The Supreme Court. Montgomery (Appellant) v Lanarkshire Health Board (Respondent) (Scotland) [Internet]. London: The Supreme Court; 2015. Available at https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2013-0136-judgment.pdf [Accessed May 2022].

3. How to handle informed consent in longitudinal studies when participants have a limited understanding of the study

4. “Informed” consent in adult patients: can we achieve a gold standard?

5. Consent to Treatment in the Post-montgomery ERA: Principles and Implications for the Dental Team

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Que retiennent les patients de la consultation d’anesthésie;Le Praticien en Anesthésie Réanimation;2024-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3