Affiliation:
1. New York Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center
2. Adelphi University
Abstract
This study investigated individual differences in self-esteem, capacity for intimacy, relationship values and influence strategy use as factors in self-reported intimacy levels for women in homosexual and heterosexual couples. There were no differences by relationship type in levels of self-esteem, capacity for intimacy or in the valuing of relationship qualities. Women in both types of couples described their relationships as highly intimate and reported using Direct/Bilateral influence strategies most frequently. For both groups, higher levels of relationship intimacy were associated with more frequent use of Direct/Bilateral strategies and less frequent use of Indirect/Unilateral and Indirect/Bilateral strategies. Capacity for intimacy and self-esteem were strongly positively related to intimacy for women in same-sex but not cross-sex couples. The best predictor of intimacy for women in heterosexual couples was a negative one: more frequent use of Indirect strategies was associated with lower levels of intimacy.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Communication,Social Psychology
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Love me, because I rely on you: Dependency-oriented help-seeking as a strategy for human mating.;Journal of Personality and Social Psychology;2024-03-14
2. Liebe als Intimität;Liebe – kulturübergreifend betrachtet;2023
3. The Key Role of Vulnerability in Developing Authentic Connections in Romantic Relationships;Cyprus Turkish Journal of Psychiatry & Psychology;2022
4. Models of Love as Social Connections;Cultural Typologies of Love;2022
5. Love as Intimacy;Cross-Cultural Perspectives on the Experience and Expression of Love;2019