Coping with global uncertainty: Perceptions of COVID-19 psychological distress, relationship quality, and dyadic coping for romantic partners across 27 countries-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Coping with global uncertainty: Perceptions of COVID-19 psychological distress, relationship quality, and dyadic coping for romantic partners across 27 countries

Published:2021-08-26 Issue:1 Volume:39 Page:3-33
ISSN:0265-4075
Container-title:Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
language:en
Short-container-title:Journal of Social and Personal Relationships

Author:

Randall Ashley K.¹^ORCID,Leon Gabriel¹,Basili Emanuele²,Martos Tamás³^ORCID,Boiger Michael⁴,Baldi Michela²^ORCID,Hocker Lauren¹^ORCID,Kline Kai¹,Masturzi Alessio²^ORCID,Aryeetey Richmond⁵,Bar-Kalifa Eran⁶,Boon Susan D.⁷^ORCID,Botella Luis⁸^ORCID,Burke Tom⁹¹⁰,Carnelley Katherine B.¹¹,Carr Alan¹⁰^ORCID,Dash Arobindu¹²^ORCID,Fitriana Mimi¹³,Gaines Stanley O.¹⁴,Galdiolo Sarah¹⁵^ORCID,Hart Claire M.¹¹,Joo Susanna¹⁶^ORCID,Kanth Barani¹⁷,Karademas Evangelos¹⁸,Karantzas Gery¹⁹,Landolt Selina A.²⁰^ORCID,McHugh Louise¹⁰^ORCID,Milek Anne²¹,Murphy Eddie¹⁰²²^ORCID,Natividade Jean C.²³,Portugal Alda²⁴²⁵,Quiñones Álvaro²⁶,Relvas Ana Paula²⁷²⁵,Rumondor Pingkan C. B.²⁸^ORCID,Rusu Petruta²⁹,Sallay Viola³^ORCID,Saul Luis Angel³⁰^ORCID,Schmitt David P.¹⁴,Sels Laura³¹^ORCID,Shujja Sultan³²,Taylor Laura K.¹⁰³³^ORCID,Ozguluk S. Burcu³⁴,Verhofstadt Leslie³¹,Yoo Gyesook³⁵,Zemp Martina³⁶^ORCID,Donato Silvia³⁷,Totenhagen Casey J.³⁸,van Eickels Rahel L.³⁶^ORCID,Adil Adnan³²,Anaba Emmanuel Anongeba⁵^ORCID,Asampong Emmanuel⁵,Beauchemin-Roy Sarah³⁹^ORCID,Berry Anna¹⁰^ORCID,Brassard Audrey⁴⁰^ORCID,Chesterman Susan¹⁹^ORCID,Ferguson Lizzie¹⁹,Fonseca Gabriela²⁷²⁵^ORCID,Gaugue Justine¹⁵^ORCID,Geonet Marie⁴¹^ORCID,Hermesch Neele²¹^ORCID,Abdul Wahab Khan Rahmattullah Khan⁴²,Knox Laura¹⁹^ORCID,Lafontaine Marie-France⁴³^ORCID,Lawless Nicholas¹⁹^ORCID,Londero-Santos Amanda⁴⁴^ORCID,Major Sofia⁴⁵⁴⁶^ORCID,Marot Tiago A.²³^ORCID,Mullins Ellie¹⁹,Otermans Pauldy C. J.¹⁴^ORCID,Pagani Ariela F.⁴⁷^ORCID,Parise Miriam³⁷^ORCID,Parvin Roksana¹²,De Mallika¹²^ORCID,Péloquin Katherine³⁹,Rebelo Bárbara²⁷²⁵^ORCID,Righetti Francesca⁴⁸^ORCID,Romano Daniel¹⁹^ORCID,Salavati Sara⁷,Samrock Steven¹^ORCID,Serea Mary¹⁴^ORCID,Seok Chua Bee⁴⁹^ORCID,Sotero Luciana²⁷²⁵^ORCID,Stafford Owen⁵⁰^ORCID,Thomadakis Christoforos¹⁸^ORCID,Topcu-Uzer Cigdem⁵¹,Ugarte Carla⁵²,Low Wah Yun⁵³,Simon-Zámbori Petra³^ORCID,Siau Ching Sin⁵⁴,Duca Diana-Sînziana²⁶,Filip Cornelia²⁶^ORCID,Park Hayoung¹⁶^ORCID,Wearen Sinead²²,Bodenmann Guy²⁰,Chiarolanza Claudia²^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Arizona State University, USA

2. Sapienza-University of Rome, Italy

3. University of Szeged, Hungary

4. University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands

5. University of Ghana, Ghana

6. Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel

7. University of Calgary, Canada

8. Ramon Llull University, Spain

9. National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland

10. University College Dublin, Ireland

11. University of Southampton, UK

12. IUBAT—International University of Business Agriculture & Technology, Bangladesh

13. International University of Malaya-Wales, Malaysia

14. Brunel University London, UK

15. University of Mons, Belgium

16. Yonsei University, Korea

17. Pondicherry University, India

18. University of Crete, Greece

19. Deakin University, Australia

20. University of Zurich, Switzerland

21. University of Münster, Germany

22. Health Service Executive, Ireland

23. Pontificia Universidade Catòlica do Rio de Jaineiro, Brazil

24. University of Madeira, Portugal

25. Center for Social Studies (CES-UC) of University of Coimbra

26. Universidad de Tarapacá, Chile

27. Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences of University of Coimbra

28. Bina Nusantara University, Indonesia

29. University of Suceava, Romania

30. Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, Spain

31. Ghent University, Belgium

32. University of Sargodha, Pakistan

33. Queen’s University Belfast, UK

34. TED University, Turkey

35. Kyung Hee University, Korea

36. University of Vienna, Austria

37. Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore-Milan, Italy

38. University of Alabama, USA

39. Université de Montréal, Canada

40. Université de Sherbrooke, Canada

41. University of Louvain / Haute Ecole Léonard de Vinci, Belgium

42. Education University of Sultan Idris, Malaysia

43. University of Ottawa, Canada

44. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

45. Center for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive Behavioral Intervention (CINEICC), University of Coimbra, Portugal

46. University of the Azores, Portugal

47. University of Urbino, Italy

48. VU Amsterdam, the Netherlands

49. Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia

50. Maynooth University, Ireland

51. University of Arizona, USA

52. Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Chile

53. Universiti Malaya, Malaysia

54. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia

Abstract

Following the global outbreak of COVID-19 in March 2020, individuals report psychological distress associated with the “new normal”—social distancing, financial hardships, and increased responsibilities while working from home. Given the interpersonal nature of stress and coping responses between romantic partners, based on the systemic transactional model this study posits that perceived partner dyadic coping may be an important moderator between experiences of COVID-19 psychological distress and relationship quality. To examine these associations, self-report data from 14,020 people across 27 countries were collected during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic (March–July, 2020). It was hypothesized that higher symptoms of psychological distress would be reported post-COVID-19 compared to pre-COVID-19 restrictions (Hypothesis 1), reports of post-COVID-19 psychological distress would be negatively associated with relationship quality (Hypothesis 2), and perceived partner DC would moderate these associations (Hypothesis 3). While hypotheses were generally supported, results also showed interesting between-country variability. Limitations and future directions are presented.

Funder

American Psychological Association, Office of International Affairs

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Communication,Social Psychology

Link

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/02654075211034236

Reference34 articles.

1. Bar-Kalifa E., Randall A. K., Perelman Y. (in press). Daily dyadic coping during COVID-19 among Israeli couples. Emotion.

2. Bates D., Mächler M., Bolker B., Walker S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01

3. Dyadic Coping and Its Significance for Marital Functioning.

Cited by 46 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. COVID-19, Family and Love Relationships: Perception of Stress, Relational Quality, Family Functioning and Online Infidelity Behaviors;Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy;2024-01-27

2. Innovative strategies for increasing sample size and diversity in family science research;Journal of Marriage and Family;2024-01-11

3. How did you perceive the lifestyle changes caused by the COVID-19 pandemic?;Humanities and Social Sciences Communications;2024-01-06

4. COVID‐19: Family resilience in a context of vulnerability;Journal of Family Theory & Review;2023-12-28

5. Examining associations between distress tolerance, perceived COVID-19 threat, and psychological outcomes: The moderating role of social support;Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships;2023-12-07