Affiliation:
1. Cornell University, USA
2. University of Indianapolis, USA
Abstract
Locations where individuals meet romantic partners may influence the composition and perceived extent of network social support for relationships. In this article, we use in-depth qualitative interviews to examine how 62 cohabiting couples (124 individuals) met their romantic partners, whether this differentiates respondents’ perceptions of support for their relationships, and how this varies by social class. Many of the cohabiting couples in our sample met through friends and family members who can be considered strong ties. Couples also frequently reported meeting in the community, often while pursuing hobbies. Shared network ties and common interests are often attributed to facilitating the progression of relationships. Couples who met through more anomic settings—at a bar or via the Internet—less often viewed their ways of meeting as socially acceptable; many of these couples devised cover stories to tell others about how they met. Our results suggest that those who meet via weak ties perceive lower levels of support for their unions. Working-class couples meet in more anomic settings or through weaker ties more frequently than their middle-class counterparts. Results are interpreted in light of their implications for the diverging family outcomes of working-class and middle-class young adults.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Communication,Social Psychology
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Setting Appropriateness and Romantic Relationship Initiation Success;Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin;2024-03-18
2. Social Networks and Extended Families;The Routledge Handbook of Family Communication;2021-11-16
3. Socioeconomic Status and Intimate Relationships;Annual Review of Psychology;2021-01-04
4. Beliefs about finding a compatible partner in three settings;Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships;2020-01-06
5. Beliefs about finding a compatible partner in three settings;Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships;2020-01-06