Affiliation:
1. Department of Philosophy and Religion, Northeastern University, USA
Abstract
In this article I offer a Black feminist sacred citational praxis supported by considerations of how subjectivity, relationality, and epistemology speak to questions, such as: which voices contribute to the stories we tell, the arguments that we make, and what is our responsibility to marking and naming those voices? Certainly, the calling of academic names, those thinkers and scholars recognized in academia largely through peer-reviewed writings, is both commonplace and normative. This includes both people who are living and those who have passed. That is, part of our accepted normal praxis is being in conversation with the dead. Yet largely we don’t speak of the “normative” citations as a spiritual practice, or recognize the naming, quoting, and reproducing of people’s voices after they have passed on in that vein. What if we did? What would that look like?
Reference36 articles.
1. Ahmed S (2013) Making feminist points. In: feministkilljoys. Available at: feministkilljoys.Com/2013/09/11/making-feminist-points/ (accessed 25 May 2023).
2. Pedagogies of Crossing
3. The Metaphysics of Decolonization: Healing Historical Trauma and Indigenous Liberation in advance
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献