Which Analysts Lead the Herd in Stock Recommendations?

Author:

Booth Laurence1,Chang Bin2,Zhou Jun3

Affiliation:

1. University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

2. University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, Ontario Canada

3. Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Abstract

This article identifies a leader–follower relationship in stock recommendations and documents the characteristics of lead analysts. We develop a metric for identifying lead analysts based on the observation that lead analysts have directed a “path” for the consensus in the past year. We find that recommendations are more likely to direct a path for the consensus when they are issued by lead analysts, accompanied by concurrent earnings forecast in the same direction from the same analysts, away from the consensus, followed by price momentum, issued on large and high growth firms, and issued by analysts from large brokers with less frequent recommendations. This result still holds even after controlling for public information, excluding news announcement dates, Regulation Fair Disclosure legislation, and other robustness checks. Empirical analysis shows that there is a greater market reaction to the recommendations of lead analysts than others.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Finance,Accounting

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Earnings pressure and R&D cut: the moderating effects of family control and debt;Management Research Review;2020-10-24

2. Bold Stock Recommendations: Informative or Worthless?;Contemporary Accounting Research;2020-04-13

3. Information versus imitation in a real-time agent-based model of financial markets;Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination;2019-04-17

4. Do Corporate Governance Analysts Matter? Evidence from the Expansion of Governance Analyst Coverage;Journal of Accounting Research;2019-02-14

5. Order Book on Financial Networks;Network Theory and Agent-Based Modeling in Economics and Finance;2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3