Mixed Methods Research in Secondary Transition: A Systematic Literature Review

Author:

Kutscher Elisabeth L.1ORCID,Mazzotti Valerie L.2ORCID,McDaniel Sara L.3ORCID,Zeng Wen4,Reardon Kyle5,Bumble Jennifer L.6ORCID,Voggt Ashley7,Harris Ryan8

Affiliation:

1. The George Washington University, DC, USA

2. The University of Kansas, Lawrence, USA

3. California State University-East Bay, Hayward, USA

4. University of Missouri-St. Louis, USA

5. University of Oregon, Eugene, USA

6. American Institutes for Research, Arlington, VA, USA

7. Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, USA

8. University of North Carolina-Charlotte, USA

Abstract

A main goal of secondary transition is to prepare and empower all students to pursue their goals after completing high school. Mixed methods research, which integrates qualitative and quantitative approaches, can provide insights into secondary transition experiences and outcomes for secondary youth with disabilities. Although mixed methods research may inform transition planning, practice, and services, little is known about the application of mixed methods research in the field of secondary transition. This systematic literature review examined the application of mixed methods approaches across 39 peer-reviewed articles focused on secondary transition research. Emphasis was placed on the recent scope of mixed methods research in secondary transition and the quality assessment of methods used in included studies. The results indicated mixed methods research focuses on a range of transition predictors and outcomes. However, quality assessment of included articles revealed that quality indicators were inconsistently applied, with few articles meeting items that were unique to mixed methods approaches. Recommendations for the application of mixed methods within the field of secondary transition are discussed along with suggestions and implications for future research, policy, and practice.

Funder

Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3